He has had more cordial more productive meetings with US President Donald Trump since that now-notorious encounter on February 28. kraken5af44k24fwzohe6fvqfgxfsee4lgydb3ayzkfhlzqhuwlo33ad.onion But for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky today’s meeting at the White House will surely trigger awkward memories of that very public clash with the US President almost six months ago. Navigating the treacherous waters in which he finds himself today will be no easier. kraken6gf6o4rxewycqwjgfchzgxyfeoj5xafqbfm4vgvyaig2vmxvyd onion Increasingly it appears likely he will be told to give up land in exchange for some sort of security guarantees. The land side of that “deal” will be obvious. It can be drawn on a map. Crimea: gone says Trump. Donetsk: give all of it up says Putin apparently with Trump’s blessing. But the security guarantees? That’s where far more challenging ideas like credibility come into play. Could Zelensky rely on the US to deliver on some NATO Article 5-type promise to defend Ukraine if Russia breaches any peace agreement? Putin himself might even see an opportunity to further weaken the West by testing any such guarantees confident they are a bluff he could call. But all that would be for the future. For now it looks like Zelensky will have to weigh up whether he could bring his country with him if he were to cede territory to Russia – some of it still in Ukrainian hands – or whether he and his people could bear the costs of potentially defying Trump a Nobel Peace Prize and say no. If he chose the latter would the US President immediately end all remaining American support for Ukraine in terms of military aid and intelligence sharing for instance? If that happened to what extent could Zelensky’s European allies really step in and fill in the gaps left by any full US retreat? It is an almost impossibly hard choice before him. kraken3yvbvzmhytnrnuhsy772i6dfobofu652e27f5hx6y5cpj7rgyd.onion https://kraken3yvbvzmhytnrnuhsy772i6dfobofu652e27f5hx6y5cpj7rgyd.com
He has had more cordial more productive meetings with US President Donald Trump since that now-notorious encounter on February 28. kraken7jmgt7yhhe2c4iyilthnhcugfylcztsdhh7otrr6jgdw667pqd.onion But for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky today’s meeting at the White House will surely trigger awkward memories of that very public clash with the US President almost six months ago. Navigating the treacherous waters in which he finds himself today will be no easier. kraken4qzqnoi7ogpzpzwrxk7mw53n5i56loydwiyonu4owxsh4g67yd Increasingly it appears likely he will be told to give up land in exchange for some sort of security guarantees. The land side of that “deal” will be obvious. It can be drawn on a map. Crimea: gone says Trump. Donetsk: give all of it up says Putin apparently with Trump’s blessing. But the security guarantees? That’s where far more challenging ideas like credibility come into play. Could Zelensky rely on the US to deliver on some NATO Article 5-type promise to defend Ukraine if Russia breaches any peace agreement? Putin himself might even see an opportunity to further weaken the West by testing any such guarantees confident they are a bluff he could call. But all that would be for the future. For now it looks like Zelensky will have to weigh up whether he could bring his country with him if he were to cede territory to Russia – some of it still in Ukrainian hands – or whether he and his people could bear the costs of potentially defying Trump a Nobel Peace Prize and say no. If he chose the latter would the US President immediately end all remaining American support for Ukraine in terms of military aid and intelligence sharing for instance? If that happened to what extent could Zelensky’s European allies really step in and fill in the gaps left by any full US retreat? It is an almost impossibly hard choice before him. kraken7jmgt7yhhe2c4iyilthnhcugfylcztsdhh7otrr6jgdw667pqd https://kraken3yvbvzmhytnrnuhsy772i6dfobofu652e27f5hx6y5cpj7rgydd.com
What were covering • Zelensky in Washington: European leaders will join Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the White House as he meets with US President Donald Trump this afternoon. Trump said Zelensky must agree to some of Russia’s conditions — including that Ukraine cede Crimea and agree never to join NATO — for the war to end. kra34 СЃСЃ • Potential security guarantees: At last week’s summit with Trump Russian President Vladimir Putin agreed to allow security guarantees for Ukraine and made concessions on “land swaps” as part of a potential peace deal US envoy Steve Witkoff told CNN. Zelensky suggested that such guarantees would need to be stronger than those that “didn’t work” in the past. Russia has yet to mention such agreements. kra40 СЃСЃ • On the ground: Zelensky condemned Russia’s latest strikes across Ukraine which killed at least 10 people saying the Kremlin intends to “humiliate diplomatic efforts” and underscores “why reliable security guarantees are required.” kra40 СЃСЃ https://kra36.org
He has had more cordial more productive meetings with US President Donald Trump since that now-notorious encounter on February 28. kraken4qzqnoi7ogpzpzwrxk7mw53n5i56loydwiyonu4owxsh4g67yd But for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky today’s meeting at the White House will surely trigger awkward memories of that very public clash with the US President almost six months ago. Navigating the treacherous waters in which he finds himself today will be no easier. kraken7jmgt7yhhe2c4iyilthnhcugfylcztsdhh7otrr6jgdw667pqd.onion Increasingly it appears likely he will be told to give up land in exchange for some sort of security guarantees. The land side of that “deal” will be obvious. It can be drawn on a map. Crimea: gone says Trump. Donetsk: give all of it up says Putin apparently with Trump’s blessing. But the security guarantees? That’s where far more challenging ideas like credibility come into play. Could Zelensky rely on the US to deliver on some NATO Article 5-type promise to defend Ukraine if Russia breaches any peace agreement? Putin himself might even see an opportunity to further weaken the West by testing any such guarantees confident they are a bluff he could call. But all that would be for the future. For now it looks like Zelensky will have to weigh up whether he could bring his country with him if he were to cede territory to Russia – some of it still in Ukrainian hands – or whether he and his people could bear the costs of potentially defying Trump a Nobel Peace Prize and say no. If he chose the latter would the US President immediately end all remaining American support for Ukraine in terms of military aid and intelligence sharing for instance? If that happened to what extent could Zelensky’s European allies really step in and fill in the gaps left by any full US retreat? It is an almost impossibly hard choice before him. kraken7jmgt7yhhe2c4iyilthnhcugfylcztsdhh7otrr6jgdw667pqd https://kraken5af44k24fwzohe6fvqfgxfsee4lgydb3ayzkfhlzqhuwlo3ad.com
What were covering • Zelensky in Washington: European leaders will join Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the White House as he meets with US President Donald Trump this afternoon. Trump said Zelensky must agree to some of Russia’s conditions — including that Ukraine cede Crimea and agree never to join NATO — for the war to end. kra35 • Potential security guarantees: At last week’s summit with Trump Russian President Vladimir Putin agreed to allow security guarantees for Ukraine and made concessions on “land swaps” as part of a potential peace deal US envoy Steve Witkoff told CNN. Zelensky suggested that such guarantees would need to be stronger than those that “didn’t work” in the past. Russia has yet to mention such agreements. kra30 at • On the ground: Zelensky condemned Russia’s latest strikes across Ukraine which killed at least 10 people saying the Kremlin intends to “humiliate diplomatic efforts” and underscores “why reliable security guarantees are required.” kra32 at https://at-kra35.cc
It’s no secret how President Donald Trump feels about sports teams turning away from Native American mascots. He’s repeatedly called for the return of the Washington Redskins and Cleveland Indians claiming their recent rebrands were part of a “woke” agenda designed to erase history. But one surprising team has really gotten the president’s attention: the Massapequa Chiefs. The Long Island school district has refused to change its logo and name under a mandate from New York state banning schools from using team mascots appropriating Indigenous culture. Schools were given two years to rebrand but Massapequa is the lone holdout having missed the June 30 deadline to debut a new logo. kra34 at The district lost an initial lawsuit it filed against the state but now has the federal government on its side. In May Trump’s Department of Education intervened on the district’s behalf claiming the state’s mascot ban is itself discriminatory. Massapequa’s Chiefs logo — an American Indian wearing a yellow feathered headdress — is expected to still be prominently displayed when the fall sports season kicks off soon putting the quiet Long Island hamlet at the center of a political firestorm. kra34 cc The district is now a key “battleground” said Oliver Roberts a Massapequa alum and the lawyer representing the school board in its fresh lawsuit against New York claiming that the ban is unconstitutional and discriminatory. The Trump administration claims New York’s mascot ban violates Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 which prohibits recipients of federal funds from engaging in discriminatory behavior based on race color or national origin — teeing up a potentially precedent-setting fight. The intervention on behalf of Massapequa follows a pattern for a White House that has aggressively applied civil rights protections to police “reverse discrimination” and coerced schools and universities into policy concessions by withholding federal funds. “Our goal is to assist nationally” Roberts said. “It’s us putting forward our time and effort to try and assist with this national movement and push back against the woke bureaucrats trying to cancel our country’s history and tradition.” kra38 at https://kra-39–cc.ru
Кракен ссылка остаётся ключом к доступу в даркнет. Кракен актуальная ссылка обновляется для безопасности. В 2025 году кракен ссылка 2025 обеспечивает анонимность и надёжность соединения для пользователей. Вход: кракен ссылка 2025
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky will meet US President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris in Washington on Thursday. Leon Neal/Getty Images CNN — Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s visit to the White House on Thursday could be his final chance to convince a receptive American president of his country’s war aims. MEGA ссылка The precise details of the “victory plan” Zelensky plans to present in separate meetings to President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris are unknown having been closely held until they are presented to the American leaders. But according to people briefed on its broad contours the plan reflects the Ukrainian leader’s urgent appeals for more immediate help countering Russia’s invasion. Zelensky is also poised to push for long-term security guarantees that could withstand changes in American leadership ahead of what is widely expected to be a close presidential election between Harris and former President Donald Trump. The plan people familiar with it said acts as Zelensky’s response to growing war weariness even among his staunchest of western allies. It will make the case that Ukraine can still win — and does not need to cede Russian-seized territory for the fighting to end — if enough assistance is rushed in. That includes again asking permission to fire Western provided long-range weapons deeper into Russian territory a line Biden once was loathe to cross but which he’s recently appeared more open to as he has come under growing pressure to relent. Even if Biden decides to allow the long-range fires it’s unclear whether the change in policy would be announced publicly. Biden is usually apt to take his time making decisions about providing Ukraine new capabilities. But with November’s election potentially portending a major change in American approach to the war if Trump were to win Ukrainian officials — and many American ones — believe there is little time to waste. MEGA https://megaweb-15at.com Trump has claimed he will be able to “settle” the war upon taking office and has suggested he’ll end US support for Kyiv’s war effort. “Those cities are gone they’re gone and we continue to give billions of dollars to a man who refused to make a deal Zelensky. There was no deal that he could have made that wouldn’t have been better than the situation you have right now. You have a country that has been obliterated not possible to be rebuilt” Trump said during a campaign speech in Mint Hill North Carolina on Wednesday. Comments like those have lent new weight to Thursday’s Oval Office talks according to American and European officials who have described an imperative to surge assistance to Ukraine while Biden is still in office. As part of Zelensky’s visit the US is expected to announce a major new security package thought it will likely delay the shipping of the equipment due to inventory shortages CNN previously reported according to two US officials. On Wednesday the US announced a package of 375 million. The president previewed Zelensky’s visit to the White House a day beforehand declaring on the margins of the United Nations General Assembly his administration was “determined to ensure that Ukraine has what it needs to prevail in fight for survival.” MEGA “Tomorrow I will announce a series of actions to accelerate support for Ukraine’s military – but we know Ukraine’s future victory is about more than what happens on the battlefield it’s also about what Ukrainians do make the most of a free and independent future which so many have sacrificed so much for” he said.
Since India’s independence from Britain in 1947 the status of English in India has been deeply political – entwined with questions of identity power and national direction. Today English is one of several official languages in India spoken by about 10 of the population. Hindi is the first language for around 44 of citizens according to the 2011 census. tripscan But in recent years Modi’s BJP has placed particular emphasis on promoting Hindi and reducing the use of English in public life. The prime minister almost never delivers speeches in English preferring Hindi for national addresses such as his monthly radio program. His administration has encouraged officials to use Hindi on social media and in government correspondence – though after criticism from non-Hindi-speaking states clarified that this was intended mainly for the Hindi belt in the north. https://trip-scan.biz tripscan When India hosted world leaders for the 2023 G20 summit in New Delhi invitations were sent out from “Bharat” – the Sanskrit or Hindi name for the country – instead of “India” fueling speculation that the government aims to ultimately phase out the country’s English designation altogether. Modi’s critics have been quick to note his political motives behind these moves. With its roots in the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh RSS a right-wing organization that advocates Hindu hegemony within India the BJP’s language policies resonate with many in a country where nearly 80 of people are Hindu. Analysts say the BJP is seeking to capitalize on this demographic by promoting language policies that strengthen its support base in the north. According to Rita Kothari an English professor from Ashoka University the government “is certainly interested in homogenizing the country and making Hindi more widespread.” But that policy can also backfire – in part because many regions such as Marathi-speaking Maharashtra in the west – are staunchly proud of their local language. The violent clashes in the state’s megacity Mumbai earlier this month were sparked by the regional government’s controversial decision to make Hindi a compulsory third language in public primary schools. Pushback and protest has also been especially strong in the south where English and regional languages such as Tamil Telugu and Kannada are valued as symbols of local identity and autonomy.
He has had more cordial more productive meetings with US President Donald Trump since that now-notorious encounter on February 28. kraken5af44k24fwzohe6fvqfgxfsee4lgydb3ayzkfhlzqhuwlo33ad.onion But for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky today’s meeting at the White House will surely trigger awkward memories of that very public clash with the US President almost six months ago. Navigating the treacherous waters in which he finds himself today will be no easier. kraken6gf6o4rxewycqwjgfchzgxyfeoj5xafqbfm4vgvyaig2vmxvyd onion Increasingly it appears likely he will be told to give up land in exchange for some sort of security guarantees. The land side of that “deal” will be obvious. It can be drawn on a map. Crimea: gone says Trump. Donetsk: give all of it up says Putin apparently with Trump’s blessing. But the security guarantees? That’s where far more challenging ideas like credibility come into play. Could Zelensky rely on the US to deliver on some NATO Article 5-type promise to defend Ukraine if Russia breaches any peace agreement? Putin himself might even see an opportunity to further weaken the West by testing any such guarantees confident they are a bluff he could call. But all that would be for the future. For now it looks like Zelensky will have to weigh up whether he could bring his country with him if he were to cede territory to Russia – some of it still in Ukrainian hands – or whether he and his people could bear the costs of potentially defying Trump a Nobel Peace Prize and say no. If he chose the latter would the US President immediately end all remaining American support for Ukraine in terms of military aid and intelligence sharing for instance? If that happened to what extent could Zelensky’s European allies really step in and fill in the gaps left by any full US retreat? It is an almost impossibly hard choice before him. kraken3yvbvzmhytnrnuhsy772i6dfobofu652e27f5hx6y5cpj7rgyd.onion https://kraken3yvbvzmhytnrnuhsy772i6dfobofu652e27f5hx6y5cpj7rgyd.com
He has had more cordial more productive meetings with US President Donald Trump since that now-notorious encounter on February 28. kraken7jmgt7yhhe2c4iyilthnhcugfylcztsdhh7otrr6jgdw667pqd.onion But for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky today’s meeting at the White House will surely trigger awkward memories of that very public clash with the US President almost six months ago. Navigating the treacherous waters in which he finds himself today will be no easier. kraken4qzqnoi7ogpzpzwrxk7mw53n5i56loydwiyonu4owxsh4g67yd Increasingly it appears likely he will be told to give up land in exchange for some sort of security guarantees. The land side of that “deal” will be obvious. It can be drawn on a map. Crimea: gone says Trump. Donetsk: give all of it up says Putin apparently with Trump’s blessing. But the security guarantees? That’s where far more challenging ideas like credibility come into play. Could Zelensky rely on the US to deliver on some NATO Article 5-type promise to defend Ukraine if Russia breaches any peace agreement? Putin himself might even see an opportunity to further weaken the West by testing any such guarantees confident they are a bluff he could call. But all that would be for the future. For now it looks like Zelensky will have to weigh up whether he could bring his country with him if he were to cede territory to Russia – some of it still in Ukrainian hands – or whether he and his people could bear the costs of potentially defying Trump a Nobel Peace Prize and say no. If he chose the latter would the US President immediately end all remaining American support for Ukraine in terms of military aid and intelligence sharing for instance? If that happened to what extent could Zelensky’s European allies really step in and fill in the gaps left by any full US retreat? It is an almost impossibly hard choice before him. kraken7jmgt7yhhe2c4iyilthnhcugfylcztsdhh7otrr6jgdw667pqd https://kraken3yvbvzmhytnrnuhsy772i6dfobofu652e27f5hx6y5cpj7rgydd.com
What were covering • Zelensky in Washington: European leaders will join Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the White House as he meets with US President Donald Trump this afternoon. Trump said Zelensky must agree to some of Russia’s conditions — including that Ukraine cede Crimea and agree never to join NATO — for the war to end. kra34 СЃСЃ • Potential security guarantees: At last week’s summit with Trump Russian President Vladimir Putin agreed to allow security guarantees for Ukraine and made concessions on “land swaps” as part of a potential peace deal US envoy Steve Witkoff told CNN. Zelensky suggested that such guarantees would need to be stronger than those that “didn’t work” in the past. Russia has yet to mention such agreements. kra40 СЃСЃ • On the ground: Zelensky condemned Russia’s latest strikes across Ukraine which killed at least 10 people saying the Kremlin intends to “humiliate diplomatic efforts” and underscores “why reliable security guarantees are required.” kra40 СЃСЃ https://kra36.org
He has had more cordial more productive meetings with US President Donald Trump since that now-notorious encounter on February 28. kraken4qzqnoi7ogpzpzwrxk7mw53n5i56loydwiyonu4owxsh4g67yd But for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky today’s meeting at the White House will surely trigger awkward memories of that very public clash with the US President almost six months ago. Navigating the treacherous waters in which he finds himself today will be no easier. kraken7jmgt7yhhe2c4iyilthnhcugfylcztsdhh7otrr6jgdw667pqd.onion Increasingly it appears likely he will be told to give up land in exchange for some sort of security guarantees. The land side of that “deal” will be obvious. It can be drawn on a map. Crimea: gone says Trump. Donetsk: give all of it up says Putin apparently with Trump’s blessing. But the security guarantees? That’s where far more challenging ideas like credibility come into play. Could Zelensky rely on the US to deliver on some NATO Article 5-type promise to defend Ukraine if Russia breaches any peace agreement? Putin himself might even see an opportunity to further weaken the West by testing any such guarantees confident they are a bluff he could call. But all that would be for the future. For now it looks like Zelensky will have to weigh up whether he could bring his country with him if he were to cede territory to Russia – some of it still in Ukrainian hands – or whether he and his people could bear the costs of potentially defying Trump a Nobel Peace Prize and say no. If he chose the latter would the US President immediately end all remaining American support for Ukraine in terms of military aid and intelligence sharing for instance? If that happened to what extent could Zelensky’s European allies really step in and fill in the gaps left by any full US retreat? It is an almost impossibly hard choice before him. kraken7jmgt7yhhe2c4iyilthnhcugfylcztsdhh7otrr6jgdw667pqd https://kraken5af44k24fwzohe6fvqfgxfsee4lgydb3ayzkfhlzqhuwlo3ad.com
What were covering • Zelensky in Washington: European leaders will join Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the White House as he meets with US President Donald Trump this afternoon. Trump said Zelensky must agree to some of Russia’s conditions — including that Ukraine cede Crimea and agree never to join NATO — for the war to end. kra35 • Potential security guarantees: At last week’s summit with Trump Russian President Vladimir Putin agreed to allow security guarantees for Ukraine and made concessions on “land swaps” as part of a potential peace deal US envoy Steve Witkoff told CNN. Zelensky suggested that such guarantees would need to be stronger than those that “didn’t work” in the past. Russia has yet to mention such agreements. kra30 at • On the ground: Zelensky condemned Russia’s latest strikes across Ukraine which killed at least 10 people saying the Kremlin intends to “humiliate diplomatic efforts” and underscores “why reliable security guarantees are required.” kra32 at https://at-kra35.cc
It’s no secret how President Donald Trump feels about sports teams turning away from Native American mascots. He’s repeatedly called for the return of the Washington Redskins and Cleveland Indians claiming their recent rebrands were part of a “woke” agenda designed to erase history. But one surprising team has really gotten the president’s attention: the Massapequa Chiefs. The Long Island school district has refused to change its logo and name under a mandate from New York state banning schools from using team mascots appropriating Indigenous culture. Schools were given two years to rebrand but Massapequa is the lone holdout having missed the June 30 deadline to debut a new logo. kra34 at The district lost an initial lawsuit it filed against the state but now has the federal government on its side. In May Trump’s Department of Education intervened on the district’s behalf claiming the state’s mascot ban is itself discriminatory. Massapequa’s Chiefs logo — an American Indian wearing a yellow feathered headdress — is expected to still be prominently displayed when the fall sports season kicks off soon putting the quiet Long Island hamlet at the center of a political firestorm. kra34 cc The district is now a key “battleground” said Oliver Roberts a Massapequa alum and the lawyer representing the school board in its fresh lawsuit against New York claiming that the ban is unconstitutional and discriminatory. The Trump administration claims New York’s mascot ban violates Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 which prohibits recipients of federal funds from engaging in discriminatory behavior based on race color or national origin — teeing up a potentially precedent-setting fight. The intervention on behalf of Massapequa follows a pattern for a White House that has aggressively applied civil rights protections to police “reverse discrimination” and coerced schools and universities into policy concessions by withholding federal funds. “Our goal is to assist nationally” Roberts said. “It’s us putting forward our time and effort to try and assist with this national movement and push back against the woke bureaucrats trying to cancel our country’s history and tradition.” kra38 at https://kra-39–cc.ru
Кракен ссылка остаётся ключом к доступу в даркнет. Кракен актуальная ссылка обновляется для безопасности. В 2025 году кракен ссылка 2025 обеспечивает анонимность и надёжность соединения для пользователей. Вход: кракен ссылка 2025
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky will meet US President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris in Washington on Thursday. Leon Neal/Getty Images CNN — Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s visit to the White House on Thursday could be his final chance to convince a receptive American president of his country’s war aims. MEGA ссылка The precise details of the “victory plan” Zelensky plans to present in separate meetings to President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris are unknown having been closely held until they are presented to the American leaders. But according to people briefed on its broad contours the plan reflects the Ukrainian leader’s urgent appeals for more immediate help countering Russia’s invasion. Zelensky is also poised to push for long-term security guarantees that could withstand changes in American leadership ahead of what is widely expected to be a close presidential election between Harris and former President Donald Trump. The plan people familiar with it said acts as Zelensky’s response to growing war weariness even among his staunchest of western allies. It will make the case that Ukraine can still win — and does not need to cede Russian-seized territory for the fighting to end — if enough assistance is rushed in. That includes again asking permission to fire Western provided long-range weapons deeper into Russian territory a line Biden once was loathe to cross but which he’s recently appeared more open to as he has come under growing pressure to relent. Even if Biden decides to allow the long-range fires it’s unclear whether the change in policy would be announced publicly. Biden is usually apt to take his time making decisions about providing Ukraine new capabilities. But with November’s election potentially portending a major change in American approach to the war if Trump were to win Ukrainian officials — and many American ones — believe there is little time to waste. MEGA https://megaweb-15at.com Trump has claimed he will be able to “settle” the war upon taking office and has suggested he’ll end US support for Kyiv’s war effort. “Those cities are gone they’re gone and we continue to give billions of dollars to a man who refused to make a deal Zelensky. There was no deal that he could have made that wouldn’t have been better than the situation you have right now. You have a country that has been obliterated not possible to be rebuilt” Trump said during a campaign speech in Mint Hill North Carolina on Wednesday. Comments like those have lent new weight to Thursday’s Oval Office talks according to American and European officials who have described an imperative to surge assistance to Ukraine while Biden is still in office. As part of Zelensky’s visit the US is expected to announce a major new security package thought it will likely delay the shipping of the equipment due to inventory shortages CNN previously reported according to two US officials. On Wednesday the US announced a package of 375 million. The president previewed Zelensky’s visit to the White House a day beforehand declaring on the margins of the United Nations General Assembly his administration was “determined to ensure that Ukraine has what it needs to prevail in fight for survival.” MEGA “Tomorrow I will announce a series of actions to accelerate support for Ukraine’s military – but we know Ukraine’s future victory is about more than what happens on the battlefield it’s also about what Ukrainians do make the most of a free and independent future which so many have sacrificed so much for” he said.
Since India’s independence from Britain in 1947 the status of English in India has been deeply political – entwined with questions of identity power and national direction. Today English is one of several official languages in India spoken by about 10 of the population. Hindi is the first language for around 44 of citizens according to the 2011 census. tripscan But in recent years Modi’s BJP has placed particular emphasis on promoting Hindi and reducing the use of English in public life. The prime minister almost never delivers speeches in English preferring Hindi for national addresses such as his monthly radio program. His administration has encouraged officials to use Hindi on social media and in government correspondence – though after criticism from non-Hindi-speaking states clarified that this was intended mainly for the Hindi belt in the north. https://trip-scan.biz tripscan When India hosted world leaders for the 2023 G20 summit in New Delhi invitations were sent out from “Bharat” – the Sanskrit or Hindi name for the country – instead of “India” fueling speculation that the government aims to ultimately phase out the country’s English designation altogether. Modi’s critics have been quick to note his political motives behind these moves. With its roots in the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh RSS a right-wing organization that advocates Hindu hegemony within India the BJP’s language policies resonate with many in a country where nearly 80 of people are Hindu. Analysts say the BJP is seeking to capitalize on this demographic by promoting language policies that strengthen its support base in the north. According to Rita Kothari an English professor from Ashoka University the government “is certainly interested in homogenizing the country and making Hindi more widespread.” But that policy can also backfire – in part because many regions such as Marathi-speaking Maharashtra in the west – are staunchly proud of their local language. The violent clashes in the state’s megacity Mumbai earlier this month were sparked by the regional government’s controversial decision to make Hindi a compulsory third language in public primary schools. Pushback and protest has also been especially strong in the south where English and regional languages such as Tamil Telugu and Kannada are valued as symbols of local identity and autonomy.
God see